Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nao Hibino vs Su Jeong Jang Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hibino vs Jang analysis and find out who is favored!
Nao Hibino vs Su Jeong Jang Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hibino 3 - 1 Jang
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hibino has won 45.22% of points on their second serve, while Jang has won 47.86%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hibino, in recent form, has won 54.02% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jang has won 51.66%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.3% and 41.28% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hibino has saved 54.64% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jang has saved 45.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hibino has won 51.52% of matches played (W/L 34/ 32), with Jang winning 53.19% (W/L 25/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hibino has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 15/ 11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 45/ 55). Jang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 68/ 35), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 18/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Hibino has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 54.17% of matches (W/L 13/ 11), where as Jang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.78% of matches (W/L 19/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Hibino winning 3 times and Jang being victorious 1 times. They have played 9 sets in total, with Hibino winning 7 and Jang winning 2. The last match between Hibino and Jang was at the W25 Kashiwa, 09-04-2023, Final, Hard with Nao Hibino getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:49:27.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hibino and Jang have played a deciding set 1 times, with Hibino winning 0 times and Jang 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hibino winning 0, and Jang 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hibino has played against opponents with an average rank of 197.86 while Jang has played against players with an average rank of 258.26.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hibino has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jang has won 10% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hibino has converted 45.95% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jang has converted 47.93% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
95
Rank
56
High
29
Age
R
Plays
3
Total1
2
Hard1
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
256
Rank
114
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
55% (372-300)
Career Total W/L
60% (417-282)
50% (18-18)
YTD W/L
59% (13-9)
$1,237,138
Career Prize Money
$340,345
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Nao Hibino vs Su Jeong Jang For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Hibino VS Jang
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Nao Hibino | Su Jeong Jang |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 3 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 7 | 2 |
| Games Won | 50 | 40 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:49:27 | 0:49:27 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (92/140) | 59% (78/133) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (61/92) | 50% (39/78) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (19/48) | 47% (26/55) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 79% (11/14) | 44% (7/16) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (68/133) | 43% (60/140) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (3/4) | 25% (1/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 25% (4/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 | |||||
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Nao Hibino
Player
Su Jeong Jang
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Su Jeong Jang
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
46%
(
30 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
| 5-7 6-3 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nao Hibino | Su Jeong Jang |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (18/18) | 59% (13/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (43/46) | 61% (30/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (400/398) | 55% (247/206) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 55% (12/10) | 53% (8/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 22% (2/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (2/0) | 71% (5/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.14 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 55 | 25 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 100 | 48 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:52 | 1:35:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 173.14 | 319.05 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1758/2616) | 70% (883/1257) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (1098/1758) | 61% (535/883) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (388/858) | 48% (179/374) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (136/296) | 48% (81/169) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (1123/2620) | 45% (609/1354) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 62% (8/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 100% (3/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 45% (5/6) | 53% (9/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (18/36) | 59% (13/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 59% (10/17) | 20% (1/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (16/12) | 100% (12/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (16/4) | 0% (12/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 30% (20/6) | 10% (10/1) |
Nao Hibino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Arantxa Rus
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Suzan Lamens
74%
(
67 of
91)
1st Serve %
76%
(
65 of
86)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
35 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
96
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Nao Hibino
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Nao Hibino
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Noma Akugue Noha
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Anna Bondar
58%
(
52 of
89)
1st Serve %
52%
(
45 of
86)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Nao Hibino
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Nao Hibino
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
5
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
47%
(
44 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
50 of
100)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristina Mladenovic
Player
Nao Hibino
66%
(
77 of
117)
1st Serve %
57%
(
56 of
99)
0
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
9
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
41%
(
48 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
99)
116
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
Player
Nao Hibino
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Su Jeong Jang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mariam Bolkvadze
Player
Su Jeong Jang
67%
(
80 of
119)
1st Serve %
66%
(
68 of
103)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
5
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
46%
(
55 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
103)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emina Bektas
Player
Su Jeong Jang
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
77%
(
41 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Haruna Arakawa
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
62 of
85)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Yuki Naito
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emina Bektas
Player
Su Jeong Jang
72%
(
77 of
107)
1st Serve %
72%
(
78 of
108)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
44 of
78)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
42%
(
45 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
108)
110
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(6) 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Yexin Ma
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
54%
(
42 of
78)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
42 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Zarina Diyas
74%
(
59 of
80)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Lizette Cabrera
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
34 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
2-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arina Rodionova
Player
Su Jeong Jang
67%
(
70 of
105)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
47%
(
49 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
86)
102
Total Points Won
89
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Yuriko Miyazaki
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
66
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Hibino Vs Jang Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Hibino are available here and Jang photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Nao Hibino
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
